minority shareholder oppression

Disguising Dividends as Bonuses Evidences Minority Shareholder Oppression

Minority shareholder oppression scenarios are typical. An individual joins a closely-held business as a minority owner and employee. The understanding is that the benefits of ownership will compensate for the below-market salary. The company terminates the individual and, either during or after employment, the majority shareholders take actions to deprive him of the reasonably expected benefits of ownership. This often includes lining their pockets.

Minority Shareholder Oppression Cases

Minority shareholder oppression case litigation often requires analyzing the salary, dividends and bonuses paid—or not paid—to the employees and shareholders. The terminated minority shareholder/employee will no longer receive salary or bonuses. Meanwhile, the majority shareholders continue to pay themselves substantial salaries, loan themselves money at below-market rates, and pay themselves substantial bonuses.

Case Study

In White, an individual joined a start-up business as an 8% shareholder and employee. Several years later, the company fired him. Prior to his termination the company never paid significant bonuses. After his termination, he sued for oppression. He claimed the majority shareholder was taking interest-free loans and paying substantial bonuses (while not declaring dividends). After paying substantial bonuses, this majority shareholder was forcing a capital call to dilute his interests.

Among other holdings, the bankruptcy court found the bonuses were disguised dividends. The court considered two factors in their findings. Firstly, the company declared the bonuses at year-end after knowing reported earnings. Lastly, the court considered the corporate tax benefit that declared bonuses instead of dividends.

The disguised dividends, personal loans, and imposition of a post-bonus-payment capital call, led the court to find shareholder oppression and award damages. The company was ordered, at the election of the minority shareholder, to either buy out the minority shareholder or be subjected to an injunction dictating how compensation of any kind may be paid.

Protecting Your Business Interests

For more information regarding minority shareholder oppression actions and protecting your business interests, contact Rogge Dunn Group business lawyer Gregory M. Clift at 214.239.2777 or clift@RoggeDunnGroup.com.

MEDIA

Labor Law Attorney, Rogge Dunn Explains Free Speech Protections For Government vs. Private Companies In One On One Interview
READ MORE
Employment Attorney, Rogge Dunn Weighs In On Free Speech Laws
READ MORE
Court Grants Directed Verdict in Favor of RDG Client in Restrictive Covenant Lawsuit
READ MORE
Gregory M. Clift Secures Defense Win in Tennessee Products Liability Case
READ MORE
Patrick McShan Becomes Licensed FINRA Arbitrator
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn quoted in: Waivers Likely Won’t Provide Protection in Litigation Over Texas Flooding
READ MORE
Former Copart HR exec alleges discrimination, harassment, and retaliation
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn on CBS News Texas Live from Ukraine
READ MORE
RDG Dines with Purpose for Ukrainian Civilians
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Former Corporate President Over Confidentiality Breach
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Represents Former Copart Executive in Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Named to Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers for 2025.
READ MORE
TRO Victory: Collin Quigley Secures Court Win for Physician Client
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn – Fox 4 News Resource
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Featured in Lawdragon: The Power of Persuasion in Trial Law
READ MORE
Attorney Rogge Dunn on “Skip a Payment” Mortgage Refinancing Scheme with D Magazine
READ MORE

Contact Us Today!

Contact us to learn how we can help answer your legal questions.

FILL OUT FORM