Dunn Quoted in AdvisorHub on Impact of DOL Conflict-of-Interest Rule on Financial Advisors

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

Recruiting bonuses will face a major overhaul as a result of new guidance that the Department of Labor issued on its impending conflict-of-interest rule on Thursday.

In a long-anticipated list of 34 “Frequently Asked Questions,” the DOL said upfront signing bonuses will be permitted as long as they are paid as a fixed sum and are tied to length of stay. However, payment contingent on meeting particular asset or sales targets —as most are today—can create “acute conflicts of interest” and will be impermissible, the DOL said in the 22-page update.

“[B]ack-end awards commonly result in large amounts of income to the adviser that are paid on an ‘all or nothing’ basis, contingent on the adviser’s satisfaction of revenue or asset targets,” the DOL wrote. “Such disproportional amounts of compensation significantly increase conflicts of interest for advisers making recommendations to investors, particularly as the adviser approaches the target.”

The interpretation will dramatically change recruiting packages going forward, and could lead some firms to try to restructure existing deals, said Rogge Dunn, an employment lawyer with Rogge Dunn Group in Dallas.

“The old school model won’t work,” he wrote in an email. “There will be more scrutiny of [an] FA’s book, as future bonuses can’t be tied to production metrics.”

Deferred contingent bonuses already in place will be permitted under grandfathering provisions once the rule becomes effective on April 10, 2017, but firms will have to subject brokers receiving them to higher levels of scrutiny.

“To the extent the financial institution chooses to honor these pre-existing arrangements, however, it must adopt special policies and procedures specifically aimed at the conflicts of interest introduced by the arrangements and designed to protect investors from harm,” the FAQ says. “These policies and procedures should establish an especially strict system of supervision and monitoring of conflicts of interest, particularly as the adviser approaches sales targets.”

The payments will be subject to the conflict-of-interest rule’s Best Interest Contract Exemption, which permits customers to sue brokers who put their own interests ahead of their customers.

In another key interpretation, the Labor Department said brokerage firms can continue to compensate brokers with variable payouts based on production, but only if such variable grid structures “are not intended or reasonably expected to cause advisers to make recommendations that are not in the best interest of retirement investors and…do not cause advisers to violate the reasonable compensation standard.”

Brokerage firms “must take special care in developing and monitoring compensation systems to ensure that they do not run counter to the fundamental obligation to provide advice that is in the customer’s best interest,” the DOL said.

As an example of conflict-tainted grid payouts, the DOL said that firms cannot give payouts for selling mutual funds that pay firms more for distribution than others.

”If, for example, different mutual fund complexes pay different commission rates to the firm, the grid cannot pass along this conflict of interest to advisers by paying the adviser more for the higher commission funds and less for the lower commission funds (e.g., by giving the adviser a set percentage of the commission generated for the firm),” the DOL said.

DOL Prohibits Deferred Recruiting Bonuses Under New Rule – AdvisorHub 2017-02-06

DOL Prohibits Deferred Recruiting Bonuses Under New Rule

MEDIA

Compliance Insight From a Lawyer for Financial Advisors
READ MORE
D Magazine Publishes Article by Rogge Dunn on How to Avoid Liabilities at Company Holiday Parties
READ MORE
Firm Partner Brian P. Shaw Secures Client Victory in Bankruptcy Proceeding
READ MORE
Dec. 13, 2019: Rogge Dunn To Speak at The Knowledge Group’s Live Webcast, “FINRA Arbitration Hot Topics for 2020: Updates You Should Know.”
READ MORE
Dec. 5, 2019: John Lynch To Speak at Belo Mansion, “The University of Dallas: Why It’s a Great Undergraduate Choice for Aspiring Lawyers.”
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Interviewed on WFAA About Cancer in Firefighters
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Group Recognized by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® as a “Best Law Firm” of 2020
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Interviewed on CBS This Morning Regarding Title IX Issues
READ MORE
California Law Affects How Student-Athletes Are Compensated
READ MORE
Updates to Overtime Rule
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted In D Magazine Article About FINRA’s Proposed Rule and the Resulting Obligations on Firms with a History of Misconduct
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in AdvisorHub Article – Finra Suspends Ex-Wells Fargo Broker over Personal Email Use
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in AdvisorHub Article Regarding Arbitration Claim Filed By His Client
READ MORE
Fair Compensation for Female Executives: Insight from an Executive Compensation Attorney
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in SportsDay Article on the use of LLCs by College Football Coaches
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in AdvisorHub Article – Schwab Pursues Nebraska Broker Who Went Independent
READ MORE

Contact Us Today!

Contact us to learn how we can help answer your legal questions.

FILL OUT FORM