-
Clint Dye
Clint Dye is a dynamic trial attorney with a proven track record of securing high-stakes wins in complex civil litigation, combining courtroom excellence with strong leadership and negotiation skills.
Clint Dye has represented clients in a wide range of civil litigation claims including products liability, trucking and transportation, premises liability, Dram Shop, insurance law, and construction. He is well-versed in managing all litigation responsibilities and trial strategies from start to finish. He demonstrates exceptional proficiency in negotiating and advocating for his clients.
Prior to joining the Rogge Dunn Group, Clint worked for Pappas Grubbs Price PC and Walters, Balido & Crain, L.L.P.
Clint possesses inherent leadership qualities. He was president of his class each year in law school at Texas Tech University and president of the entire student body his final year. He competed in seven national advocacy teams and represented the U.S. at the 2019 ABA International Negotiations competition in Tokyo, where his team finished fifth in the world.
As a passionate sportsman, Clint obtained his Masters of Sport Management in addition to his law degree. He has served as a certified USSSA Baseball Umpire for over 10 years, has visited 24 out of the 30 Major League Baseball stadiums and regularly plays golf.
NOTABLE RESULTS AND SUCCESSES:
- Lead attorney on 75+ commercial policy cases whereby Clint routinely handled all litigation responsibilities and trial strategies from start to finish (pleadings, discovery, experts, depositions, mediation, pre-trial conferences, trial, etc.).
- Lead associate at jury trial for a Collin County case where Plaintiff argued that Clint’s clients, a property conglomerate within DFW and their corresponding property management company, improperly provided Plaintiff’s husband unlawful access to her apartment complex which subsequently resulted in alleged injuries to both Plaintiff and her two minor children. After Plaintiff’s presentation of evidence, Clint argued a Motion for Directed Verdict on all twelve (12) causes of action asserted by Plaintiff whereby the entire Motion for Directed Verdict was granted in the Defendants’ favor as to each individual cause of action. Plaintiff was expected to ask the jury for around $2.5 million dollars.
- Recently had a Default Judgment, that was granted against Clint’s clients in the amount of $760,000, set aside after Filing a Motion for New Trial & Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. The night before the hearing, Clint negotiated with opposing counsel a settlement of only $100,000 to have the entire case closed and dismissed with prejudice, including an Agreed Order to Set Aside the Default Judgment filed with the Court.