FINRA Attorney

Using A FINRA Attorney to Smoothly Part Ways Within the Financial Industry

Using U-5 Forms As a Weapon

Parting ways is never easy, but in the financial industry it brings along an added layer of difficulty. When a financial advisor leaves a firm, for any reason, the U-5 must be submitted within 30-days of the departure. A FINRA attorney will warn advisors that firms may mark a U-5 form in a misleading manner for a number of reasons. But, the resulting defamation or disparagement is a serious violation of the FINRA rules. Using a U-5 as a weapon is actionable and can carry severe sanctions. For example, in Ulrich v. Wharton Whitaker and Eaton Vance Distributors, a NASD arbitration, a financial advisor/broker was awarded $625,000 in actual damages. Plus, he was awarded $1,250,000 in punitive damages and attorneys’ fees because his U-4 and U-5 were improperly marked with defamatory statements. 

Examples of Condemnations

There are other condemnations of using a U-5 form as a weapon to defame or disparage a departing financial advisor. Recently, a FINRA arbitration panel ordered UBS Financial to pay more than $11 million to a market operations supervisor. The FA alleged defamation on his U-5 form. UBS fired Mark Munizzi, the market operations supervisor, in April 2018. He claimed that UBS’ U-5 description of his termination was defamatory and kept him from finding another job in the financial industry. The FINRA arbitration panel agreed. In addition to the award, the panel ordered changing his U-5 to reflect his termination without cause. The award also included compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and interest on a portion of the damages as severance pay.

The Aggressive Use of U-5 Forms

FINRA arbitrators are clearly taking issue with aggressive use of the U-5 form. Firms should caution those employees responsible for U-5 marking to complete the U-5 with accurate information and no other agenda. On the other hand, financial advisors should be proactive in trying to determine how a firm will mark their U-5. They should negotiate with the firm before the filing a U-5, should it appear a misleading mark. FINRA attorneys agree that it’s easier to address inaccuracies before filing a U-5 than to undergo a lengthy expungement process.  In either event, an experienced FINRA attorney can guide a financial advisor through the process. 

Rogge Dunn Group, an experienced FINRA arbitration attorney, has extensive experience working with financial advisors across the country on an entire array of industry issues, including transitioning from prior firms. To contact us about legal issues surrounding the financial industry, click here.

MEDIA

Rogge Dunn Quoted in Financial Advisor on Credit Suisse Mishandling Discharge
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in Dallas Morning News Article Following Roe V. Wade Being Overturned
READ MORE
Employee Discrimination in the Workplace
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in Yahoo Article on Tesla Racial Bias Case
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in AdvisorHub Article on Stephens, Inc Arbitration Case
READ MORE
RDG WINS JURY VERDICT AND ATTORNEYS’ FEE AWARD ($1.9M) FOR CEO CLIENT
READ MORE
Bullying in the Workplace
READ MORE
Unfair Pay and Compensation in the MLB
READ MORE
Trans Athletes
READ MORE
Reverse Racism in the Workplace
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in Dallas Morning News Article on Testing Unvaccinated Employees Under New Vaccine Mandate
READ MORE
Sex Discrimination at Work
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in WFAA Article on Texas Universities Vaccine Requirements
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in D Magazine Article on Conflicting Vaccines Rules
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in FOX4 Article About Southwest Airlines Employees Protesting the Vaccine Mandate
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Quoted in Law360 Article About Employers Heeding Vaccine Mandate Ban
READ MORE

Contact Us Today!

Contact us to learn how we can help answer your legal questions.

FILL OUT FORM