noncompete agreement

Intended Expansion Fails to Support Noncompete Agreement

Noncompete agreements generally must include reasonable geographical limitations. To determine whether geographical limitations are reasonable, employers need to look at a number of factors including their business and the role of the employee entering the noncompete agreement.

Noncompete Agreement Case Study

In Cobb v. Caye Publishing Group, the parties entered a noncompete agreement that failed to include any geographical limitations. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals analyzed whether the trial court imposed proper geographical limitations in reforming the noncompete agreement.

Cobb, an independent contractor, agreed not to work for a competing publishing company or start a publication the same as he was selling for Caye Publishing if he left. Cobb eventually resigned and began publishing and distributing a similar publication outside of where he worked for Caye Publishing. Caye Publishing sued Cobb and obtained a temporary injunction preventing Cobb from distributing a competing publication in Johnson County and the cities of Aledo and Weatherford. Cobb appealed contending, in part, the temporary injunction’s geographical limitations were too broad.

The court of appeals first noted a reasonable area restriction in a noncompete generally includes where the employee worked. Cobb worked in Johnson County, only. Caye Publishing contended Aledo and Weatherford were appropriate restrictions since it intended to expand to those cities.

The court of appeals noted no case previously held an area targeted for future expansion alone was a reasonable restriction. It then observed, as a result of not entering those markets, including no substantive preparations, Caye Publishing possessed no customer goodwill to protect. Therefore, the court of appeals dissolved the temporary injunction as to Aledo and Weatherford.

The case is an important reminder to employers to focus on including supportable restrictions in any noncompete. Furthermore, the noncompetes should focus on protecting legitimate business interests.

For more information regarding protecting your business interests, contact the business lawyers at Rogge Dunn Group or Gregory M. Clift at 214.239.2777 or clift@RoggeDunnGroup.com.

MEDIA

A USERRA Decision Impacting Texas Employers and Service Members
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Featured in NY Times Article Weighing In on the Brendan Sorsby NCAA Case
READ MORE
Collin Quigley Becomes Licensed FINRA Arbitrator
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Group Attends The Covenant School’s Annual Auction
READ MORE
Attending the Eric Dickerson Hope Through Housing Charity Golf Tournament
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Group Hosts Campaign Reception for Sindhu Mareen Alexander
READ MORE
The Business of College Sports, Portal Transfers, and NIL Money
READ MORE
Gregory Clift and Rogge Dunn Group Sponsored the Aging Mind Foundation Gala
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Recognized by Lawdragon in 2026 National Guides
READ MORE
Proposed FINRA Rule on Outside Business Activities
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Featured by Lawdragon for Impactful Advocacy Across Texas and Beyond
READ MORE
New Important Legal Decision Regarding Arbitration Agreements
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Group Hosts Charity Fundraising Dinner Supporting Eric Dickerson Learning Center
READ MORE
Rogge Dunn Group Attorneys Win Significant Gender Discrimination and Equal Pay Ruling Against Global Advertising Giant
READ MORE
How Texas Employers Should Respond to Medical Marijuana Law Changes
READ MORE
Dallas CEO ordered to pay $5.7 million in workplace sexual harassment case
READ MORE

Contact Us Today!

Contact us to learn how we can help answer your legal questions.

FILL OUT FORM